Truro Quiet Lanes Trial

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

For latest information on the scheme scroll down to Update - October 2022


We are working with partners to improve the health and fitness of residents and visitors, and tackle climate change, by promoting walking and cycling projects and encouraging more people to leave their cars at home.

One of these projects involved the Quiet Lanes, a network of rural, mainly unclassified, lanes between the B3284 (Shortlanesend area) and the A390 (Royal Cornwall Hospital and Threemilestone area).

The narrow lanes, which are unsuitable for high levels of traffic, are being used as a short cut by commuters travelling into the city and the hospital.

We carried out a trial aimed at making the lanes more attractive and accessible for people walking and cycling by reducing the amount of traffic. This was intended to create a 15km network of quiet walking and cycling routes linking key destinations in Truro, helping to encourage more healthy lifestyles after the pandemic.

What did the trial involve?

Under the trial only residents and their visitors, and companies delivering to properties within the zone, were officially allowed to use the lanes. Vehicle prohibition signs were erected at 11 entry points, with the restrictions enforceable by the police. (see Plan below or view here)

The traffic prohibitions were made using an 'Experimental Traffic Regulation Order' (copy found here). A formal statutory consultation is part of the Experimental Traffic Regulation Order process during the first 6 months of the trial. Traffic and user surveys were also undertaken to assess the impact of the scheme.

Feedback from that process, alongside the user surveys and comparison of 'before and during' traffic monitoring data fed into the eventual decision on whether to make the traffic prohibitions permanent, to change the trial or scrap the whole idea.

The trial went live on Thursday 16th September 2021 and finished on 15th September 2022.

Update - October 2022 - Council listens to feedback as Truro Quiet Lanes trial comes to an end

The experimental trial to reduce through traffic using a network of rural lanes on the outskirts of Truro has ended and the results assessed. (See full results here)

The Quiet Lanes trial aimed to make a 15km network between Shortlanesend and Threemilestone safer for people wanting to walk and cycle there by banning motorists from driving through the narrow rural lanes unless they lived in the area or were making deliveries to residents.   

Residents and commuters have been able to give their feedback before and during the year-long trial as part of the consultation process running alongside the Experimental Traffic Regulation Order. That feedback, together with recent traffic surveys and discussions with local stakeholders, including local Cornwall councillors, has been analysed. 

 The conclusion is that the trial has not been widely supported and that there has been no material shift in the behaviour of motorists using those roads. As a result, the trial is ending, the restrictions have now been lifted, and the signs removed.

 Funding for the trial has come from the Department for Transport’s Active Travel fund which supports measures to bring about a modal shift to encourage people to walk and cycle more, especially where the journey is a short one.

Cornwall Council portfolio holder for transport Philip Desmonde said: “As part of this ‘living’ trial, a six-month statutory consultation period was in-built as part of the process to gather and assess the views of the public and stakeholders.

“The pre-trial user survey received 639 responses with 45% supporting it and 51% against the restrictions (The full results can be found here) – however the overriding majority of the circa 200 comments and emails received during the trial have been negative. The majority of these comments came from motorists who had previously used the lanes as a short cut to the A390. We have taken all the feedback, alongside the monitoring evidence, to make an informed decision on whether there are grounds to make the trial permanent, amend it or stop it. On balance, the decision is to stop and not make the order permanent as we take on board the valuable lessons that have been learned.

“For example, competing priorities for police resources and the difficulties in enforcing a ban in an area where access is still required to properties and businesses within the impacted area. Any future scheme will essentially need to be ‘self-enforcing’ or managed through the use of technology, as and when moving vehicle offences become enforceable by the Council.

“We’re committed to putting the infrastructure in place to enable people to make more sustainable choices about how they travel. Road transport is one of the biggest contributors to carbon emissions and around a quarter of car journeys in Cornwall are of less than three miles. We all need to look at how we travel and the changes we can make – big or small – that can help make a difference. It’s good for our health, the environment, and – in these increasingly cash-strapped times – our wallets too.

“This trial has helped us to understand the pressure points – which is exactly why the restrictions were introduced as a trial and not a permanent change. I'm disappointed that we have been unable to make it permanent, but given the response from motorists using the lanes as a cut through, it’s clear we need to look at providing more sustainable transport options, to relieve pressure on the A390 as well as supporting healthier, greener and more affordable ways of accessing services.”

For latest information on the scheme scroll down to Update - October 2022


We are working with partners to improve the health and fitness of residents and visitors, and tackle climate change, by promoting walking and cycling projects and encouraging more people to leave their cars at home.

One of these projects involved the Quiet Lanes, a network of rural, mainly unclassified, lanes between the B3284 (Shortlanesend area) and the A390 (Royal Cornwall Hospital and Threemilestone area).

The narrow lanes, which are unsuitable for high levels of traffic, are being used as a short cut by commuters travelling into the city and the hospital.

We carried out a trial aimed at making the lanes more attractive and accessible for people walking and cycling by reducing the amount of traffic. This was intended to create a 15km network of quiet walking and cycling routes linking key destinations in Truro, helping to encourage more healthy lifestyles after the pandemic.

What did the trial involve?

Under the trial only residents and their visitors, and companies delivering to properties within the zone, were officially allowed to use the lanes. Vehicle prohibition signs were erected at 11 entry points, with the restrictions enforceable by the police. (see Plan below or view here)

The traffic prohibitions were made using an 'Experimental Traffic Regulation Order' (copy found here). A formal statutory consultation is part of the Experimental Traffic Regulation Order process during the first 6 months of the trial. Traffic and user surveys were also undertaken to assess the impact of the scheme.

Feedback from that process, alongside the user surveys and comparison of 'before and during' traffic monitoring data fed into the eventual decision on whether to make the traffic prohibitions permanent, to change the trial or scrap the whole idea.

The trial went live on Thursday 16th September 2021 and finished on 15th September 2022.

Update - October 2022 - Council listens to feedback as Truro Quiet Lanes trial comes to an end

The experimental trial to reduce through traffic using a network of rural lanes on the outskirts of Truro has ended and the results assessed. (See full results here)

The Quiet Lanes trial aimed to make a 15km network between Shortlanesend and Threemilestone safer for people wanting to walk and cycle there by banning motorists from driving through the narrow rural lanes unless they lived in the area or were making deliveries to residents.   

Residents and commuters have been able to give their feedback before and during the year-long trial as part of the consultation process running alongside the Experimental Traffic Regulation Order. That feedback, together with recent traffic surveys and discussions with local stakeholders, including local Cornwall councillors, has been analysed. 

 The conclusion is that the trial has not been widely supported and that there has been no material shift in the behaviour of motorists using those roads. As a result, the trial is ending, the restrictions have now been lifted, and the signs removed.

 Funding for the trial has come from the Department for Transport’s Active Travel fund which supports measures to bring about a modal shift to encourage people to walk and cycle more, especially where the journey is a short one.

Cornwall Council portfolio holder for transport Philip Desmonde said: “As part of this ‘living’ trial, a six-month statutory consultation period was in-built as part of the process to gather and assess the views of the public and stakeholders.

“The pre-trial user survey received 639 responses with 45% supporting it and 51% against the restrictions (The full results can be found here) – however the overriding majority of the circa 200 comments and emails received during the trial have been negative. The majority of these comments came from motorists who had previously used the lanes as a short cut to the A390. We have taken all the feedback, alongside the monitoring evidence, to make an informed decision on whether there are grounds to make the trial permanent, amend it or stop it. On balance, the decision is to stop and not make the order permanent as we take on board the valuable lessons that have been learned.

“For example, competing priorities for police resources and the difficulties in enforcing a ban in an area where access is still required to properties and businesses within the impacted area. Any future scheme will essentially need to be ‘self-enforcing’ or managed through the use of technology, as and when moving vehicle offences become enforceable by the Council.

“We’re committed to putting the infrastructure in place to enable people to make more sustainable choices about how they travel. Road transport is one of the biggest contributors to carbon emissions and around a quarter of car journeys in Cornwall are of less than three miles. We all need to look at how we travel and the changes we can make – big or small – that can help make a difference. It’s good for our health, the environment, and – in these increasingly cash-strapped times – our wallets too.

“This trial has helped us to understand the pressure points – which is exactly why the restrictions were introduced as a trial and not a permanent change. I'm disappointed that we have been unable to make it permanent, but given the response from motorists using the lanes as a cut through, it’s clear we need to look at providing more sustainable transport options, to relieve pressure on the A390 as well as supporting healthier, greener and more affordable ways of accessing services.”

Comments

The Trial has now ended. There have been strong views expressed in response to stories in the local press and social media - to ensure we capture your views please leave any comments and feedback you have below. 

If you have queries on the trial please check the background information and answers to frequently asked questions (faq's) found in the side bar. 

Please note you can send any specific queries to the project team at traffic@cormacltd.co.uk 

loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.

We regularly walk our dog along these routes and the quiet lane scheme has not deterred the majority of users. Today there was traffic queuing at the ford at the bottom of Treworder hill.
As things stand how can you evaluate a scheme when nothing has changed.
As someone who walks these routes daily a more serious issue is the speed that some irresponsible people drive at. Maybe an enforced speed limit would be an all round result.

Bjs over 2 years ago

On Monday my spouse started to haemorrhage heavily. There was a telephone queue for an ambulance and a 20 minute queue for 111. I broke the law and took him to A&E via the quiet lanes rather than sit in the 5pm traffic through Truro. Thank goodness these lanes exist or the outcome may have been so much worse. Yes there was opposing traffic which we had to negotiate but it was not a problem. What more can I say other than these lanes are a literally a lifeline across the valley for all.

Erg over 2 years ago

The traffic in Truro has become extremely congested with all traffic now having to go through Truro rather than allowing some to go across the valley via the "Truro Quiet Lanes". Using the bypass and the Sainsbury's roundabout at peak times has become very frustrating with traffic queued for long periods of time. My average journey time has increased by 15 minutes, if this is the case for most road users then this has to be bad for the environment and, in particular, the residents, walkers, and cyclists of Truro using or living along these now very congested roads. Traffic congestion increases vehicle emissions and degrades ambient air quality, and studies have shown excess morbidity and mortality for individuals living near major roadways and those using them. There is no doubt this scheme has increased overall emissions from commuters now being stationary on the main roads through Truro. These increased emissions are now highly concentrated on the many, living on the now major congested roads, for the benefit of the few residents who don't like cars on "their" roads. I pay council tax in Cornwall and pay road tax, and I am struggling to understand how roads can just be closed and kept for the exclusive use of certain minority of the community. I would like to understand:
1) Why do the residents of country houses / homes in the "Truro Quiet Lanes" area now have priory over what are public assets, these roads were paid for and are maintained by everyone that pays council tax in Cornwall?
2) Why was this implemented with no prior consultation or the collection and publication of hard data? I think in reality we would all prefer not to have traffic on the streets where we live, however, this is not reality of modern life in what is a rural county.
3) Why was this implemented without thinking about the knock on effect and schemes to alleviate traffic increases elsewhere?
4) If there is an issue with speed on these lanes, then why not introduce speed humps or speed cameras?

This scheme is ill thought through, and has a very detrimental impact on the many for the benefit of the few.

Dr Cooper

Dr Cooper over 2 years ago

These closures are pushing traffic on to already extremely busy roads; traffic calming measures in the lanes would be more appropriate. Kenwyn road has seen a noticeable increase in traffic, much of it travelling in excess of the speed limit. Average speed check cameras are urgently needed on this road as this is a walking route to and from St Mary's Primary and to all the Secondary Schools for children that live in the area. Children are walking sometime only a foot away from cars, lorries, vans and tractors where the road narrows and some even mount the pavement to pass oncoming vehicles. Moreover, cars often ignore the zebra crossing further up the hill. The quiet lane proposal must be accompanied by appropriate safety measures on the other roads in to town that are seeing more traffic. Surely we should be encouraging more walking and cycling in to town/to school to reduce congestion and pollution, not making it more dangerous?

LouiseT over 2 years ago

Regarding the quiet lanes project between threemilestone and shortlanesend I'll be very curious to know what do you mean when you say you are using data.

Any data collected about cyclist and walkers will be poor quality with small subjective samples whereas any car data will have the benefit of road traffic counting boxes along  with signs discouraging and banning motorists.  Even without the trial I can tell you traffic will decrease as you've put up signs!!


Being a cyclist, motorcyclist, walker and car driver using these routes I noted Councillor Roden correctly points out: “It’s all well and good leaving these lanes for bikes and walkers but unless you’re a Tour De France cyclist you’re not going to be able to make it up New Mills Lane.

Current cyclists like myself use these places anyway and know the traffic risks just like many miles of other roads in Cornwall.
New  brigade of cyclists will not make it up these hills anyway unless on e bikes.

What is your plan to gather data? Please don't tell me a survey!! You are not convincingly going to argue walking and cycling have increased unless you have people 'spotting' over miles and miles of lanes, counting each walker and cyclist, I guess that's not happening!

I despair at how you are effectively condemning people of Shortlanesend to misery to the north at the A30 dualling works or misery into Truro via Kenwyn.
I question the real reason, perhaps to appease developers around Langarth? After all what is better than telling them the lanes around their development have been closed to a lot of locals!

Resident of SLE, CJ over 2 years ago

I’m another who lives on and often walks in the quiet lanes, and have seen little or no reduction in traffic.

Kenwyn20 over 2 years ago

Object. Is this exercise actually legal ?The ETRO sealed document has a glaring mistake within it that has not been picked up on by the authors or the legal department of the council

Erg over 2 years ago

If this becomes permanent, we will have a choice of 1. Moving house
2. Changing schools 3. Subjecting the children to an hour long journey in traffic every morning. ALL OF WHICH AFFECT THE CHILDREN BADLY!
There are alternatives.
The area in question is almost totally devoid of any footpaths, that could easily be added, in many areas, on the safe side of the hedge. Signage could request that drivers drive below 20 mph and give right of way to cyclists and pedestrians. More passing places could be made.
And to claim it helps the environment to cause 200 cars a longer journey every single day, in preference for 3 dog wallers on a sunny day is beyond insanity. Have they not heard of climate change?
The current situation is ridiculous! The idea should be scrapped.

Mother of two beautiful children over 2 years ago

I have used the back lanes for almost 2 years as I work at the hospital. The closure has added 35 mins on average to my daily commute due to the traffic. I fail to see how spending that kind of time in traffic protects the environment. I live in Bodmin and using the back lanes I got home at 17:45 I now walk through the door at 18:20. The cost to my time and that added cost to my fuel bill is so much that I see little choice but to begin looking for alternative employment if the closure becomes permanent. It is a terrible thing that someone feels that they must look for another job because of a decision the council has made.

Cade over 2 years ago

Disgusted with this proposal!
Our MAIN roads do not cope with the traffic we already have, but for some reason the Council continues to over develop the Truro area without sorting the inadequate road system.
Surely the infrastructure should come before developing over priced housing? But don’t worry because our corrupt Council will destroy yet another beautiful valley and allow 4,000+ more houses at Langarth and a stadium we don’t need! Of course this quiet road scheme has nothing to do with them panicking about the extra traffic from that using the back roads.
The locals are punished with housing they can’t afford and now we are being told we can’t use our local back roads either!
If you have money you can buy land/property or obtain planning permission in these beautiful valleys, then have the cheek to claim them for yourselves, - these are not private drives for the privileged….. Some of us were born in this area, work in the area and pay road tax too.

Dorbs over 2 years ago

I think it is a great idea. I have noticed a reduction in cars, but still a lot of people ignoring the signs and using it as a cut through. Some of the cars are driving so fast. I'm hoping that it will become quieter so we can start walking and cycling with the little ones.

Fiestyangel42 over 2 years ago

I think it’s a good idea in theory so that more can walk down these lanes but in reality it’s made no difference the lanes are just as busy as ever if not busier!

Zennor Robinson over 2 years ago

I think it has put car users in an impossible choice of roads to get across the valley. Truro is congested to brimming in the mornings and just getting into the traffic at Highertown is a little like fairground dodgem cars! Taking at least 15 mins extra to get to the hospital or the school. Taking the route on the A30 also adds time on getting to the school or hospital. Often being queued to get onto the A30 and then Chiverton roundabout. I definitely do not agree with closure of the lanes when it is such a good way to get across the valley. Admitted some people do drive a little faster than necessary and maybe that is good to focus on and if possible monitor! Roads are for driving on, not just built for walkers and horse riders and cyclists. I have not heard of any accidents, personally, or injuries of drivers using these back roads. To be honest, our little road is used massively where I live in Shortlanesend, and stepping out onto it is equally as annoying but it’s a road and that is where cars are going to drive! 🤔

Resident Adult over 2 years ago

This is horrendous, it is pushing more pollution and traffic on to the main road to Truro, enabling possibly more accidents and more traffic through one road. Instead it should be speed limiting like speed bumps or a quiet time like a bus lane rather than restricting completely and pushing people on to one road which gather more pollution and more traffic in one spot. I cannot believe money has been spent on this you would have been better off spending it on Boris bikes than this what a waste of money.

Tillz over 2 years ago

Having lived in the village of Shortlanesend for 20 years I have often walked the back lanes with my children and our dog and I can hand on heart say I have no issues with the volume of traffic that we’re using the lanes . Yes on occasion speed has been an issue but never volume of traffic . A simple speed calming or speed restrictions would suffice rather than the system you are trying to implement now .
There are arguments from both sides and I understand that but at the end of the day we are simply moving the issue into Truro city centre and to do this at the same time as the works on the A30 is just crazy .
Get one job complete before starting another! Our roads couldn’t cope before and have no hope now !
This needs to be stopped and thought through properly and done at a time that the roads aren’t already overloaded.

Sle/lanes/Tms no way over 2 years ago

If these closures are to continue, more needs to be done about the other roads that the traffic is pushed out on to.
Average speed cameras please.
Particularly on Kenwyn Road. It’s notorious for speeding as it’s a hill, and has a lot of residential and community facilities along it.
The safety of other areas affected by this must be addressed, and soon.

LisaS over 2 years ago

I fully support the "romantic" idea of quiet back lanes and that traffic should stick to main roads. However, it is a fact and reality that the local road infrastructure is insufficient for the present day traffic volume. Continued development on the outskirts of Truro have largely been responsible for this and the proposed development at Langarth will exacerbate the problem. The B3284 has become a major feeder road into Truro, with traffic avoiding parts of the A30, A39 and A390. However, in my experience, the majority of the traffic using the back lanes, is local traffic rather than from a wider area, which has little to gain by using the lanes.

I have to say that some of the comments made by certain individuals are preposterous. Yes, some drivers travel too fast along the back lanes, but most are sensible - I very often walk and cycle in the lanes and it is only the odd individual that drives inappropriately, as on all other roads. A lower speed limit would be useless, as without enforcement would not be complied with - the same issue with the "no motor vehicles except for access" signs.

Although I support the ethos behind the proposal, I have to admit that having taken into account all the factors, I reluctantly cannot support the scheme. The main roads will only get more congested and drivers will ignore signs that are not enforced. The issue stems from a lack of forward thinking by Cornwall Council, when continually granting planning permission for developments, without doing anything about the infrastructure.

Finally, the consultation should have taken place before the trial, following a detailed road census, not just counting vehicles. With the money spent on the scheme including permanent looking signs, etc., it gives the impression it is a done deal!

SLE Resident over 2 years ago

I think this scheme is not a good idea as it puts more vehicles on the other roads. Coming from shortlanesend to go to Truro college, I would have to take the Kenwyn road down in to town. I would go up train station hill up to county hall and we all know this road is a nightmare at the best of times. It's added an extra 20 minutes to the journey which doesn't help with air pollution. The traffic in Truro is getting much worse unfortunately.

Steve. over 2 years ago

I have never used the ‘trial area’ due to living on Treyew Road, but from the day the trial started my commute to work now take 20 minutes longer due to traffic around sainsburys roundabout, this is 100% due to the amount of extra cars now having to use this road daily instead. You’ve made an already busy road, BUSIER!!

kenza over 2 years ago

the amount of brain dead women speeding through the back lanes was unbelievable 98.4% of them cannot reverse. they have no business being down there. They are a complete danger to other road users.

its a much better place now!!!!!
keep the lanes quiet
all you lazy bums complaining GET OUT OF BED EARLIER!!!!!!!!

sarah laroi over 2 years ago
Page last updated: 28 Jan 2024, 07:40 AM