Skip to content
site banner

SAR subgroup effectiveness survey-questions 2021

1.  

The SAR Subgroup has representatives from All partner agencies in CIOS who are engaged and sufficiently senior to proactively get things done?

Maximum 20,000 characters

0/20,000

3.  

Partner agencies in CIOS understand the relevant legislation regarding the referral process and commissioning of SARs?

Maximum 20,000 characters

0/20,000

5.  

SAR referrals and decision making are timely, and meeting minutes and reviews clearly note reasons for decisions made and positive or negative delays?

Maximum 20,000 characters

0/20,000

7.  

The SAR subgroup involves and shares learning from experiences involving the individual and/or their family in SARs through local/regional and national networks?

Maximum 20,000 characters

0/20,000

9.  

The SAR subgroup clearly ensures SARs identify the types of abuse, neglect and themes within cases being reviewed?

Maximum 20,000 characters

0/20,000

11.  

The SAR subgroup meetings are frequent enough, well-structured, chaired and planned to ensure that new SAR referrals, existing cases and ongoing work streams are well managed.

Maximum 20,000 characters

0/20,000

13.  

The SAR subgroup effectively reports back and is able to escalate any concerns to the SAB and SAB exec group?

Maximum 20,000 characters

0/20,000

Maximum 20,000 characters

0/20,000

Privacy notice